|
|
|
The intention of my writing is to offer my honest opinions of films, film culture and current practice. As a highly opinionated, frustrated filmmaker, my writing may piss people off. I may include reviews, or comment on filmmakers, actors, studio trends etc. HOLLYWOOD GOES RE-MAKE BANANAS
However the general feeling is “remakes have generally been considered inferior to the earlier versions, by film critics and cinema-goers alike” (see here). There have of course been some notable exceptions to this e.g. The Maltese Falcon (John Huston, 1941), however on the whole it would appear to be the case, both in terms of critical acclaim and box office receipts that remakes are inferior. King Kong is a good example of this last point, it has already been remade (John Guillermin, 1976), “Dino DeLaurentis" is the big budget version of Ed Wood.
Even if you haven’t seen it you must surely be aware of the scene as Kong scales the then symbol of American wealth/greed - The Empire State building to his doom. There is so much symbolism in this which although very contemporary it still resonates today. What can Peter Jackson possibly add?
The truth is that films are viewed more as a product than an art form and as such treated less respectfully. King Kong is a classic, it stands on its own merits and doesn’t need to be remade. Would you re-make Citizen Kane? I wonder how Mr Jackson would feel if someone 10 years down the line decides to re-make Lord of The Rings? Or how would we all feel if someone announced they were intending to re-make Star Wars?
<Indies Day and the Temple of CG
© 2003 - 2008 Danny Herbert. |
|
| Connect with and Follow GrowlersWorldH |
[GrowlersWorld Top 20 Charts: Site Statistics] [Privacy Policy, Disclaimers, Small Print and Legal Stuff] [Contact] |
Like
what you see? Leave a Comment... |
GrowlersWorld
™ & © 2003
- 2010 Rawle Austin. All Rights Reserved. Made in Great Britain. |